NEW YORK—Integrated Device Technology Inc.’s deal to develop wireless charging ICs for Intel’s reference designs represents a coup for the mixed-signal company.
But whether the Intel and IDT (San Jose, Calif.) partnership can play a major role in proliferating wireless power technology is unclear. Their shared success depends on how quickly and widespread Intel’s wireless charging technology is adopted in Ultrabooks, all-in-one PCs, smartphones and standalone chargers.
And it isn’t the only wireless power standard out there. There are several others currently being developed that would enable the wireless transfer of power to charge electronic devices, including the Wireless Power Consortium’s “Qi” and the Alliance for Wireless Power (A4WP) led by Samsung and Qualcomm. And in one of its past relationships, things didn’t go the way IDT had planned.
“It’s still a show-me story,” said Robert Burleson, an analyst with investment bank Canaccord Genuity based in San Francisco. IDT had put its support behind DisplayPort in 2007 after Intel released its roadmap for the digital interface standard. OEMs didn’t roll-out DisplayPort-based products as quickly as IDT had anticipated, and its products were commoditized by the time OEMs started to go to market with them.
“The main test for IDT has to do with their allocation of R&D dollars,” Burleson said. “Analog is a fragmented marketplace, and there’s a lot of discretion in terms of how you spend your R&D and which products you go after. In the past there have been some failures, like DisplayPort, and so it’s a test of management in terms of successfully spending on R&D for products that yield revenue and good returns.”
IDT, however, works with all of the standards bodies, according to Arman Naghavi, IDT’s vice president and general manager of the Analog and Power Division. Its strategy is to build SoCs that can easily be tweaked to meet the needs of its OEM customers, regardless of the wireless charging standard their products will support.
“It appears IDT has been most aggressive in responding to the wireless charging opportunity,” said Steve Ohr, analog and power semiconductors analyst at Gartner Inc.
Fortunately for circuit designers, a new tool is available that can simplify the process of identifying the ESD suppression device best suited to an application, which makes it far easier to incorporate circuit protection earlier in the board planning process. The Littelfuse iDesign™ Online Simulation and Product Selection Tool
. I received a very good reader question from my last blog post regarding the various parameters that are reported by the tool. Let’s take a look at an example and explore the parameters that are returned. In this example we will look at the AD9643-250.
Managing system thermal performance is critical in today’s electronic systems if you are to maximize performance and the user experience. As systems grow more powerful, and in many cases smaller in size, managing the thermal profile has become an ever-increasing challenge. Monitoring the current provides a leading indicator to potential thermal issues.
In blog number 3, we are going to divert a little from our normal trend of evaluating power supply design and simulation tools. Instead, we are going to look into power management tools that are online.