REGISTER | LOGIN
Home    Bloggers    Blogs    Article Archives    Messages    About Us   
Tw  |  Fb  |  In  |  Rss
Analog Angle

Can Adding Noise Actually Improve System Performance?

Bill Schweber
GSKrasle
GSKrasle
8/6/2018 1:18:00 PM
User Rank
Artist
Re: Natural noise analysis
I have seen a lot of applications of "noise" (as in "dithering") to improve performance; it's something that is (unfortunately) not covered in curricula where frictionless vacuums are "ideal" and usable ways to deal with the real world are deferred to those (unnecessarily) painful learning experiences we all suffer when first we leave the ivory towers.

In image-processing, especially compression, dithering conceals edges introduced when dynamic range or resolution is reduced. But I use it all the time to increase ADC resolution, especially in oscilloscopes, where 8-bits is usual, with 10-bits only seldom available. Obviously, that limits the number of steps available, so it is only natural to invoke the built-in averaging function to seek more resolution. That often works, but not when you have a beautiful smooth NOISELESS signal. Adding noise, so that when the REAL signal is half-way between steps it gives half-density to each of the adjacent steps (or at least equally-distributed among steps on either side) would be ideal, but what kind of noise gives that result? Well, a sawtooth or triangle does, and is easy to subtract- or filter-out if necessary. A sine is pretty good, and even easier to remove. 

A a good example of MECHANICAL dithering (to overcome stiction, like the case mentioned in the article) applies to d'Arsonval and similar meters: either pulses are introduced into the signal itself or through a separate mechanism (vibrator). This takes the place of the user tapping the meter to make sure it doesn't stick.  

50%
50%
vbiancomano
vbiancomano
8/5/2018 3:05:27 PM
User Rank
Blogger
Natural noise analysis
Apart from the discussion of how to use noise to advantage, it always struck me odd that engineers by and large, myself included, report that the reconstructed analog output of a digitally encoded voice signal (e.g., PCM) actually sounds better than the analog source input! All this without knowingly performing any tricks with circuitry. Perception, or reality? Either way, what happens here?

50%
50%
More Blogs from Analog Angle
Simple things like proper labeling of cables and additional annotation is an easy way to make a big difference in debugging of prototypes and pilot units.
Simple problem-solving ideas can be potential winners; today’s low-cost sensors and simple I/O interfacing make many of these ideas very feasible at low R&D and BOM cost.
Second and alternate sources are both a luxury and risk for designers, so great care in listing them is mandatory.
Deciding which power-device driver to use may not seem like a big deal, but how well it matches the power device and design objectives is an important factor in overall performance and reliability.
flash poll
educational resources
 
follow Planet Analog on Twitter
Planet Analog Twitter Feed
like us on facebook
our partners
Planet Analog
About Us     Contact Us     Help     Register     Twitter     Facebook     RSS