Filters brought joy to my vacation!

Sorry to have been so quiet recently, y’all, but it was vacation time. The Castor-Perrys visited the big theme parks in Orlando and had a great time. What’s more, filters played a big part in our enjoyment! Let me explain.

I’m an electronics guy, and so most of what I write (technically at least) here and elsewhere involves fun with electrons. The filters that I talk about are generally electrical filters, whether passive LC, or active, or switched-capacitor, or calculation-based. But I’ve also been interested in optics and light for most of my life – I started wearing spectacles when I was three years old, and haven’t, well, looked back.

But electrical waves aren’t the only things that can be sorted into frequency bands with filters. Any time you wear tinted sunglasses, place a sheet of coloured glass in front of a stage spotlight, or even peer through a crumpled sweet wrapper (Quality Street in the UK would be the obvious example; I’m not a US candy aficionado ), you’re using an optical filter – a system whose optical attenuation depends on the frequency of the incoming light.

There’s been a quiet revolution in the technology behind 3D projection systems in the last few years, and filters have played a big part in this. I hadn’t noticed this until our local cinema installed a new laser projection system and started handing out there rather fancy-looking specs for 3D films. So I read up on what’s been happening – and got some real filter joy from it!

Really old-school 3D projection – with those disposable paper specs that have one reddish and one greenish plastic eye film – was a crude approximation in which each eye only receives a subset of the entire color gamut of the image. The brain (of a person with binocular vision, anyway) manages to stitch it together, and the impression is of a fully coloured scene with some 3D effects. It’s pretty poor, really – especially if, like me, you don’t have binocular vision, in which case the colour distortion is terrible.

More recently the standard has been to use specs with sheets of plastic Polaroid material in front of each eye. One of the eyes receives predominantly vertically polarized light, the other gets a horizontally polarized feed because the sheet has been rotated by 90 degrees relative to the first one. Both sheets pass all the colours in the image, producing greater colour fidelity. But the Polaroid sheets lose significant signal amplitude, and it’s hard to increase the light output of standard cinema projectors to make up for this. Another constraint is that you have to keep your head vertical in order to preserve the orientation between the Polaroids on your eyes and the matching polarizers on the projectors, or you get “double vision”. And mass production plastic Polaroid doesn’t completely eliminate light with the ‘wrong’ polarization. So again, image crosstalk can be quite a problem if your brain is doing all its work one eye at a time.

Filters to the rescue!

With the advent of so-called 6P 3D, optical projection technology has reached a new peak. The system relies on the fact that the eye – just like most camera sensors – really detects only three colours, and infers hue from the relative proportions of the signals from its three receptor channels. What this means is that you could send light of two somewhat different frequencies to the eye (or your camera), and as long as those frequencies predominantly excite only, say, your red sensor, they will both look like the same red colour .

So, the way the 3D image is constructed is with a light source that has six very precisely defined wavelength components – two reds, two greens and two blues. Each eye gets one of each colour, the separation being done by a beautifully elegant multilayer optical filter with multiple passbands. All you need to do is to get the basic amplitude relationships between each eye’s R, G and B components right and the images will have exactly the same colour balance – even though they are being constructed with light of differing wavelengths. A fantastic exploitation of the limitations of our three-colour visual system.

This is clearly shown in the frequency response (actually, wavelength response) of the filters created for the two eyes, in this image borrowed from the website of Iridian, a major supplier of precision optical filters:

Check out their website at Iridian Optical Filters– they are clearly on top of this optical filter technology and show several other interesting applications, including spectacles to protect pilots from green laser pointer light.

Now, you know I’m a filter guy, and I can’t begin to express how overjoyed I was to see just how precisely defined and delineated the frequency bands of those two filters are. This kind of filtering is difficult enough to do as an electrical filter, so the idea that you can do it by controlled deposition of many layers of carefully chosen dielectric materials in sub-wavelength thickness, at a price that fits the business model of a cinema or theme park ride, is, well, uplifting for me!

We saw quite a few theme park rides that used this approach for the 3D projection. Now you can tilt your head freely. And the separation between images is perfect, as far as I can detect.

In the very latest projection systems, the six required wavelengths of light are created by tunable lasers, sometimes even installed in a ‘light farm’ that can pump high intensity coloured light to all of the theatres in a multiplex.

Next time you’re at a 3D presentation, check out your specs. Optically-filtered ones have distinctly different hues in the reflections from each eye’s “lens” (they are curved, but don’t have any optical power) – and that’s another filtering message, loud and clear. You might ask – what happens to the light at wavelengths that the filters won’t pass? Well, it’s not absorbed, it’s reflected – just as in the case of an LC passive filter. So these optically filtered specs look rather like cool mirrored sunglasses, because they are reflecting a lot of light! And when you look at incandescent, fluorescent and LED lights through these glasses, you can see significant differences in colour balance if you concentrate on just one eye at a time. I spent much of my ride queuing time with my 6P 3D glasses on, checking out the way they filtered the various light sources around differently from one eye to the other. Probably looking more than a little weird to everyone else. But I’m a filter nerd. And I got my filter joy, even on holiday!

3 comments on “Filters brought joy to my vacation!

  1. jimfordbroadcom
    September 30, 2015

    It's about time 3D happened for real!  How else are we comms nerds (and proud of it!) going to keep pushing the bandwidth ever upwards?  I haven't noticed color aberrations in my polarization-based 3D glasses I have with my plasma TV at home, but the flickering and the dimness are very obvious.

    It makes sense that we would see this new technology with the lasers and light farms at the amusement parks first, where they can amortize the cost of the same over lots of visitors' admission tickets.  Might be a while before it gets into living rooms.

    My presonal interest in optics tends toward the comms apps like fiber, but it's always great to see some smart people doing something neat in another unrelated area.  Thanks for spreading the filter love!

  2. Katie O'Kew
    September 30, 2015

    Hey, K:


    Jolly interesting stuff. We have the IR-keyed switching glasses in our theatre,

    and they work okay. But more to the point, perhaps, is the question of Who

    Needs It? After a very short while, I feel like throwing something back at the

    screen, after dodging several voracious dragons and Dargons or whatever the

    producers dish up, to make us pop out of our seats, as in Mr. Bean's exploits.


    Neverthless, the matter of human colour perception is fascinating, whether

    exploited by the Holy Wood people, or simply looking at various LED outputs.



  3. GSKrasle
    October 2, 2015

    Interesting: I had no idea these systems worked that way! I'm glad I saved the glasses!

    How do they avoid laser-speckle? Is it that dye lasers have a wider emission band that eliminates it?

    Are LEDs narrow-band enough to be used in an LCD backlight to alternate frame-visibility?

    Some people tell me their cats are not interested in laser-pointers. I reply that they need to get a new one. (Laser that is.) The oldest pointers were relatively long-λ compared to the new ones, and look dimmer per mW (low photometric- but high radiometric intensity). To a cat, the old ones are apparently invisible because cats have a different sensitivity range than we.

    A few years ago, for Christmas, I sent everybody a dozen or two pairs of diffraction-grating glasses (from American Paper Optics), along with photographs I'd made of various light sources. I labeled some of the significant 'lines' in the spectra characteristic of mercury, neon and sodium. That allowsidentification of the working gas even if the overall hue is deceptive because of phosphors and filters. I couldn't find any hydrogen lamps except my 0C3 regulator tubes. There are other members of the '0' family with other cool gasses, but before you order, do what I didn't and make sure you're not ordering the metal-envelope version 🙁 

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.